By "the blood of the Lamb" we understand our
Lord's death as a substitutionary sacrifice.
Let us be very clear here.
It is not said that they overcame the arch-enemy by the blood of Jesus, or
the blood of Christ, but by the blood of
the Lamb; and the words are expressly chosen because, under the figure
of a lamb, we have set before us a sacrifice.
The blood of Jesus Christ,
shed because of his courage for the truth, or out of pure philanthropy, or
out of self-denial, conveys no special gospel to men, and has no peculiar
power about it. Truly it is an example worthy to beget martyrs; but it is
not the way of salvation for guilty men.
If you proclaim the death of the
Son of God, but do not show that he died the just for the unjust to bring us
to God, you have not preached the blood of the Lamb.
You must make it
known that "the chastisement of our peace was upon him," and that
"the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all," or you have
not declared the meaning of the blood of the Lamb.
There is no
overcoming sin without a substitutionary sacrifice.
The lamb under the old
law was brought by the offender to make atonement for his offense, and in
his place it was slain:
This was the type of Christ taking the sinner's
place, bearing the sinner's sin, and suffering in the sinner's stead, and
thus vindicating the justice of God, and making it possible for him to be
just and the justifier of him that believeth.
I understand this to be the
conquering weapon-the death of the Son of God set forth as the propitiation
for sin.
Sin must be punished: it is punished in Christ's death. Here is the
hope of men.
~Charles Spurgeon~
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.