Perhaps one
of the most SIGNIFICANT things to any who are
“not ignorant of his (Satan’s) devices” is
that there never has been a specially spiritual movement
of God in the earth, calculated to serve Him in a
particularly useful way, but what Satan’s animosity
thereto has been manifested along the line of division,
schism, discord, separation, and a breaking down of
fellowship.
And how often has the real sting and stigma
been modified by a feigning love unbroken and preserved,
when the divided parties should have no association with
each other in the things of God.
Love, let us again say
emphatically, is incumbent upon the Lord’s people
toward “all men”, whether of the
“household” or otherwise (Gal. 6:10), but
fellowship is something more.
It is the most spiritual
things which suffer the greatest shocks in this matter,
and again we say this carries its own Satanic
significance.
The methods
of the enemy are numberless, the “wiles”
unfathomable by human wit.
A suggestion of suspicion, if
it finds lodgment, is enough to completely paralyze the
work of God and spiritual progress.
Have a doubt and you
are done.
There never was a time when positive spiritual
work was more jeopardized by suspicion than now.
It would
seem that hell is largely employed in issuing forth
smoke, clouds, vapours, mists of suspicion, question,
reservation, in order to infect with uncertainty,
mystification, prejudice, fear, discrediting, distrust,
aloofness.
It is in the “heavenlies” that this
is most registered; that is, the higher ranges of
spiritual things.
It is an ATMOSPHERE, and it is
everywhere.
You sense it wherever you go.
In some places
it is stifling - there is no clear breath of the Spirit,
and a word of life is almost choked back.
Of course,
this is no new thing, although now so intensified.
The
New Testament is full of it.
The Lord Jesus met it - not
in spiritual people, only in religious people.
John met
it.
Paul met it in every direction.
It was made to circle
round his person, his methods, his character, and his
message.
Even some members of the mother assembly at
Jerusalem showed suspicion and lack of cordiality toward
him.
Paul’s setting aside of the Law, for instance,
seemed to them to go beyond even the Lord Himself, who
had not openly abrogated it.
Then Paul appealed to
“visions and revelations” (2 Cor. 12:1), but
they asserted that these were dubious, or at best they
could only serve to ratify his own personal convictions.
Again, both Paul and his opponents appealed to the Old
Testament, but the letter of the Old Testament seemed
undoubtedly to favor the literalists, and his
‘attempt to read new meanings’ into the old
revelation seemed to them mere cleverness.
They looked on
it as barefaced denial of the Divine Word.
To them it
looked as though he did not believe the Bible.
They
regarded his innovations as morally dangerous.
Of course,
this in SUBSTANCE ought to have no parallel
today, but it has in spirit.
There is nothing added
by revelation to the Scriptures since the New Testament
was closed, but there is much to be RECOGNIZED in them by
the enlightenment of the Spirit.
There is no new meaning,
but there is much new RECOGNITION of the meaning.
~T. Austin Sparks~